how to constrain magnetization in ABINIT?  [SOLVED]

Total energy, DFT+U, BigDFT,...

Moderator: amadon

how to constrain magnetization in ABINIT?

Postby ucsdmavrl » Tue Dec 13, 2016 9:58 am

Dear ABINIT developers and users,

I am wondering how I can successfully constrain the magnetization for a specific atom in a system. I searched the posts in the forum.(viewtopic.php?f=9&t=3337&p=10222&hilit=magconon#p10222)
It is said that we can play with the params of "magcon_lambda" and "magconon". I have a question on the param "magconon". In the doc, it says "The constraint can be either on the direction only (magconon 1) or on the full vector (magconon 2)." I am not clear about what "the direction" and "full vector" is? Could you pls explain a bit more? (say I want to constrain the spin for an atom to be:
spinat
0 0 1
how can I set magconon?

Also, when adding these two parameters, the SCF run severely diverged(total energy increase). I play with magcon_lambda from 10 ~ 300 (with step 10), they all still fail to converge, any suggestion on this?


Thanks,
Ben
ucsdmavrl
 
Posts: 8
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2016 3:24 am

Re: how to constrain magnetization in ABINIT?  [SOLVED]

Postby ilukacevic » Wed Dec 14, 2016 9:53 am

Dear ucsdmavrl,

For magconon 1, you constrain only the direction of a vector, while its size will be left open for 'relaxation' during the energy minimization.
For magconon 2, you constrain both the direction and the size of the vector, and the energy is minimized under both of these conditions.

The initial vector is given by spinat variable. So, you just have to add magconon (with the wanted value) and magcon_lambda (for which you have to find the optimal value).

Concerning the SCF issue, maybe Eric or Matthieu can give you the better answer.

Best regards,

Igor
ilukacevic
 
Posts: 271
Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 1:05 pm
Location: Dept. of Physics, University J. J. Strossmayer, Osijek, Croatia

Re: how to constrain magnetization in ABINIT?

Postby ebousquet » Thu Dec 15, 2016 12:11 am

Dear Ben,
Are you constraining your magnetization with spin-orbit coupling?
For lambda try smaller values than 10, I got some cases working fine for lambda=1 or so.
Otherwise how bad is the convergence, says on energy residual? It can help to read a wave function obtained without the constraint, but I agree the convergence can be worsened by constraining the magnetization for a reason I do not fully understand and I have to work on it.
Best,
Eric
ebousquet
 
Posts: 303
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2011 11:13 am
Location: University of Liege, Belgium


Return to Ground state

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests

cron