Search found 510 matches

by pouillon
Wed Feb 10, 2010 10:43 am
Forum: Configuring and compiling ABINIT
Topic: [solved] problem with MPI
Replies: 4
Views: 9331

Re: problem with MPI

MPI being disabled has nothing to do with what you show. In order to help you, we'll need more information.
by pouillon
Wed Feb 10, 2010 10:41 am
Forum: Configuring and compiling ABINIT
Topic: [SOLVED] MPI configuration in v.6.0.x
Replies: 2
Views: 8051

Re: MPI configuration in v.6.0.x

MPI support has been heavily refactored since 5.8. Most of the efforts have been on improving the consistency within the build system, and now MPI is handled as the other external packages. In order to be able to use --with-mpi-prefix, you should make sure that the CC, CXX, and FC environment variab...
by pouillon
Thu Jan 28, 2010 5:39 pm
Forum: Link to other codes
Topic: revPBE Pseudos
Replies: 6
Views: 9239

Re: revPBE Pseudos

by pouillon
Wed Jan 27, 2010 5:28 pm
Forum: Configuring and compiling ABINIT
Topic: [SOLVED] prefix install location
Replies: 4
Views: 7232

Re: prefix install location

Fix committed.
by pouillon
Wed Jan 27, 2010 5:01 pm
Forum: Configuring and compiling ABINIT
Topic: [SOLVED] prefix install location
Replies: 4
Views: 7232

Re: prefix install location

Dear Joe, The prefix "issue" is not a bug, it's a feature. I did this to become compliant with packaging standards. The version numbering problem you mention is known and will be fixed when you merge trunk into your branch. This was something I forgot to put in the new Abinit Forge managem...
by pouillon
Wed Dec 09, 2009 10:47 pm
Forum: Configuring and compiling ABINIT
Topic: Introduction of debug levels
Replies: 3
Views: 6829

Re: Introduction of debug levels

Debugging symbols do not affect the performance of the code, nor its memory footprint, as they are not loaded in normal runs. They only impact the size of the binary. However, it is true that the more you optimize, the less using debugging symbols is relevant. In practice, it nevertheless provides i...
by pouillon
Thu Dec 03, 2009 6:19 pm
Forum: Configuring and compiling ABINIT
Topic: Introduction of debug levels
Replies: 3
Views: 6829

Introduction of debug levels

Dear Developers, In order to facilitate the debugging of new developments, Matthieu and I are proposing to have different debug levels in the build system, controlled by --enable-debug: ⋅ no: debugging fully disabled; ⋅ yes: debug symbols are provided; ⋅ enhanced: more ...
by pouillon
Tue Dec 01, 2009 7:42 pm
Forum: Configuring and compiling ABINIT
Topic: [SOLVED] Linalg detection
Replies: 4
Views: 6158

Re: Linalg detection

I've been having plans for an improved linalg support for a few years now, and have already made a few unsuccessful attempts. It slowly goes to higher and higher priority ranks on my todo list, but there are many other emergencies. Difficult to choose what to do first, sometimes ... If the weather i...
by pouillon
Tue Dec 01, 2009 12:35 am
Forum: Improving ABINIT
Topic: Switching to RestructuredText for documentation
Replies: 0
Views: 3750

Switching to RestructuredText for documentation

Dear All, During the lifespan of Abinit 5, we've successfully used Markdown for a certain number of things. Markdown is indeed light, easy to learn, and easy to use. It was perfectly matching the requirements of our former website. However the situation has substantially changed now, and our needs h...
by pouillon
Wed Oct 21, 2009 7:05 pm
Forum: Improving ABINIT
Topic: Input Variable (rename)
Replies: 13
Views: 10999

Re: Input Variable (rename)

Do you already have proposals about the nomenclature? If not, I recommend having a look at what they did for Octopus.

I can help in particular with the practical aspects of the migration to the new naming scheme once it is defined.
pouillon