Dear dal,
You can do that easily. Just read the posts above yours and you will find a few different methods to optimize your cell.
Best regards,
Igor
Search found 268 matches
- Mon May 11, 2015 8:35 am
- Forum: Ground state
- Topic: Help: how to set up rprim for orthogonal structure
- Replies: 14
- Views: 8692
- Wed Apr 01, 2015 8:44 am
- Forum: Response calculations
- Topic: How to use foo_EIG2RD to calculate thermal corrections
- Replies: 16
- Views: 12568
Re: How to use foo_EIG2RD to calculate thermal corrections
Hi! I'm not sure, but this might be useful. From input variables I see If thmflag==3, the list of phonon wavevector from the first list is used (with equal weight for all wavevectors in this list) WARNING : The use of symmetries for the temperature dependence of the eigenenergies is tricky ! It can ...
- Tue Mar 31, 2015 8:33 am
- Forum: Response calculations
- Topic: How to use foo_EIG2RD to calculate thermal corrections
- Replies: 16
- Views: 12568
Re: How to use foo_EIG2RD to calculate thermal corrections
Hi! So I could complete the calculation for the 512 points. For some reason when I divided the points into different sets (different .in files), to have each of them take less amount on the cluster, the calculation would only finish for the first set. I wonder if having the gamma point in the set fo...
- Thu Mar 26, 2015 9:23 am
- Forum: Response calculations
- Topic: How to use foo_EIG2RD to calculate thermal corrections
- Replies: 16
- Views: 12568
Re: How to use foo_EIG2RD to calculate thermal corrections
Hi! I think I will try now just using the 512 points. And yes, it would be great if someone could confirm this. For phonons one has to set kptopt 3, but doesn't need to set nsym to 1. I should think more about this, but why is this? Using symmetries is not appropriate for RF, thus kptopt=3 and nsym=...
- Tue Mar 24, 2015 8:51 am
- Forum: Response calculations
- Topic: How to use foo_EIG2RD to calculate thermal corrections
- Replies: 16
- Views: 12568
Re: How to use foo_EIG2RD to calculate thermal corrections
Hi!
If you need nsym=1, then I suppose that you have to use all 512 k-points (unfortunately). I hope some of the elders will confirm this.
In that case, try to change brav in your anaddb input file. Try first brav=1. And maybe you'll have to play with shifts, too.
Igor
If you need nsym=1, then I suppose that you have to use all 512 k-points (unfortunately). I hope some of the elders will confirm this.
In that case, try to change brav in your anaddb input file. Try first brav=1. And maybe you'll have to play with shifts, too.
Igor
- Mon Mar 23, 2015 8:43 am
- Forum: Ground state
- Topic: Optimization of unit cell under stress.
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3816
- Mon Mar 23, 2015 8:34 am
- Forum: Response calculations
- Topic: How to use foo_EIG2RD to calculate thermal corrections
- Replies: 16
- Views: 12568
Re: How to use foo_EIG2RD to calculate thermal corrections
Hi! Maybe I can give you an answer at least to a part of your question. The dynamical matrix number 2 cannot be built, since no blok with wavevector 0.000000E+00 1.250000E-01 1.250000E-01 This message says that you merged DDBs for wrong q-points (at least one q-point). Please, check whether the list...
- Mon Feb 02, 2015 9:20 am
- Forum: Ground state
- Topic: parameters for optimization
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2075
Re: parameters for optimization
Hi! You can do a little research by your own. You can find all the answers in Tutorials http://www.abinit.org/documentation/helpfiles/for-v7.10/tutorial/lesson_base2.html http://www.abinit.org/documentation/helpfiles/for-v7.10/tutorial/lesson_base3.html and in http://www.abinit.org/documentation/hel...
- Fri Jan 30, 2015 8:54 am
- Forum: Ground state
- Topic: error in relaxation
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2007
Re: error in relaxation
Hi!
I don't know the answer, but I'm 99% sure that you could find it by searching the forum archive. Maybe you should even start with the old mailing list first.
Best regards,
Igor L.
I don't know the answer, but I'm 99% sure that you could find it by searching the forum archive. Maybe you should even start with the old mailing list first.
Best regards,
Igor L.
- Tue Jan 20, 2015 1:56 pm
- Forum: Ground state
- Topic: How to nonlinear calculation? [SOLVED]
- Replies: 2
- Views: 4389
Re: How to nonlinear calculation? [SOLVED]
Hi!
Try putting nbdbuf to 0.
Igor
Try putting nbdbuf to 0.
Igor
- Mon Nov 24, 2014 8:50 am
- Forum: Ground state
- Topic: input of Pt(111) surface [SOLVED]
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2718
Re: input of Pt(111) surface [SOLVED]
Hi,
Please read Tutorial #4
http://www.abinit.org/documentation/helpfiles/for-v7.10/tutorial/lesson_base4.html
Best regards,
Igor L.
Please read Tutorial #4
http://www.abinit.org/documentation/helpfiles/for-v7.10/tutorial/lesson_base4.html
Best regards,
Igor L.
- Mon Nov 24, 2014 8:44 am
- Forum: Ground state
- Topic: abinit variables [SOLVED]
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2665
Re: abinit variables [SOLVED]
Hi!
This is a standard question. Try searching the forum. There are number of posts which deal with this issue. Like
http://forum.abinit.org/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=1322&hilit=supercell
Best regards,
Igor
This is a standard question. Try searching the forum. There are number of posts which deal with this issue. Like
http://forum.abinit.org/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=1322&hilit=supercell
Best regards,
Igor
- Fri Nov 21, 2014 10:53 am
- Forum: Ground state
- Topic: black phosphorus input file
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4444
Re: black phosphorus input file
Yes, you got the atoms wrong. The multiplicity is 16, not 12. You know 8 positions. Use natrd 8 with natom 16 and 8 xred positions which you stated in your previous post (0,0,0) + (1/2,1/2,0) + (x,y,z) (-x,-y+1/2,z+1/2) (-x,y+1/2,-z+1/2) (x,-y,-z) (-x,-y,-z) (x,y+1/2,-z+1/2) (x,-y+1/2,z+1/2) (-x,y,z...
- Fri Nov 21, 2014 8:54 am
- Forum: Ground state
- Topic: black phosphorus input file
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4444
Re: black phosphorus input file
Hi!
I think that an error you got in your output or log file is self explanatory. You used a "tab" while making your input file. And this is not allowed. Delete "tab" spaces and use "space".
Best regards,
Igor
I think that an error you got in your output or log file is self explanatory. You used a "tab" while making your input file. And this is not allowed. Delete "tab" spaces and use "space".
Best regards,
Igor
- Tue Nov 18, 2014 10:53 am
- Forum: Ground state
- Topic: smearing for projected dos on angular momentum channels
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4767
Re: smearing for projected dos on angular momentum channels
Try to play with dosdeltae a little http://www.abinit.org/documentation/helpfiles/for-v7.0/input_variables/vargs.html#dosdeltae I think you'll have to trade the precision to get smoothness, but that's smth you'll have to decide yourself. I don't know of any post-processing tool for that. Igor
- Mon Nov 17, 2014 5:20 pm
- Forum: Ground state
- Topic: smearing for projected dos on angular momentum channels
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4767
Re: smearing for projected dos on angular momentum channels
Hi!
I think it occurs because prtdos=3 uses tetrahedron method as prtdos=2. Try using prtdos=1, which uses smearing method to calculate dos.
Best regards,
Igor
I think it occurs because prtdos=3 uses tetrahedron method as prtdos=2. Try using prtdos=1, which uses smearing method to calculate dos.
Best regards,
Igor
- Wed Nov 12, 2014 10:06 am
- Forum: Response calculations
- Topic: Phonon in SnO2 at Gamma
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4688
Re: Phonon in SnO2 at Gamma
Hi!
Maybe the problem is in the pseudopotentials used? It could be that they used different number of valence electrons in their pseudo's. They don't specify in the paper which ones they used.
Best regards,
Igor
Maybe the problem is in the pseudopotentials used? It could be that they used different number of valence electrons in their pseudo's. They don't specify in the paper which ones they used.
Best regards,
Igor
- Mon Nov 10, 2014 8:51 am
- Forum: Response calculations
- Topic: Phonon in SnO2 at Gamma
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4688
Re: Phonon in SnO2 at Gamma
Hi! 1] Are your ecut and ngkpt converged wrt phonon frequencies? 2] Are your unit cell and atomic positions relaxed? 3] Did you use the same parameters (ecut, ngkpt,...) for cell relaxation and response function? What value for Pressure do you get in your response function output? Best regards, Igor
- Thu Oct 23, 2014 8:54 am
- Forum: Ground state
- Topic: Initial ecut value
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2232
Re: Initial ecut value
Hi!
Please read
http://www.abinit.org/documentation/helpfiles/for-v7.8/tutorial/lesson_base2.html
Best regards,
Igor
Please read
http://www.abinit.org/documentation/helpfiles/for-v7.8/tutorial/lesson_base2.html
Best regards,
Igor
- Tue Apr 15, 2014 12:59 pm
- Forum: Ground state
- Topic: calculating the graphene DOS using tetrahedron method
- Replies: 5
- Views: 6934
Re: calculating the graphene DOS using tetrahedron method
Hi! For future reference you can use enunit variable set to 1 ( http://www.abinit.org/documentation/helpfiles/for-v7.6/input_variables/vargs.html#enunit ). This will give you energies in eV. Actually, I'm not sure whether this works for DOS files, too. Try it. As you already have a DOS file, just co...
- Fri Apr 11, 2014 9:55 am
- Forum: Ground state
- Topic: [SOLVED] DOS calculations
- Replies: 10
- Views: 7285
Re: [SOLVED] DOS calculations
Well, one could convert it. But it's much easier to import the wanted columns from the DOS file into Xmgrace (Data -> Import -> ASCII -> Load as Block data). That's it.
Best regards,
Igor
Best regards,
Igor
- Tue Mar 25, 2014 8:38 am
- Forum: Ground state
- Topic: partial charge density
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2601
Re: partial charge density
Hi!
For bands you just use "occ" variable, when it comes to printing, to occupy the wanted band and leave the other bands unoccupied (put occ to zero for them).
For k points I'm not sure.
Best regards,
Igor L.
For bands you just use "occ" variable, when it comes to printing, to occupy the wanted band and leave the other bands unoccupied (put occ to zero for them).
For k points I'm not sure.
Best regards,
Igor L.
- Thu Mar 20, 2014 8:15 am
- Forum: Ground state
- Topic: Ecut of 150????
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1966
Re: Ecut of 150????
Well, it has to be since you got it from your convergence calcs. HGH pseudos are know to be very "hard", so it could be that's it's no wonder you got 150 Ha.
Best regards,
Igor
Best regards,
Igor
- Fri Mar 14, 2014 10:35 am
- Forum: Configuring and compiling ABINIT
- Topic: runing abinit in free supercomputer [SOLVED]
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3984
Re: runing abinit in free supercomputer [SOLVED]
Hi! There are conditionally free computational resources. Basically you have to have a problem which will be your justification that you use resources for computation only. For example, you have to write a project proposal and if it is accepted you can run calculation regarding the project problem. ...
- Tue Mar 11, 2014 8:22 am
- Forum: Response calculations
- Topic: elastic constant for metal [SOLVED]
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3781
Re: elastic constant for metal [SOLVED]
Hi!
I see that you use iscf 5 and 3 in DS 1 and 2. Why don't you try with iscf 7 for the first hand? Then we'll see what's happening.
Igor
I see that you use iscf 5 and 3 in DS 1 and 2. Why don't you try with iscf 7 for the first hand? Then we'll see what's happening.
Igor