Search found 510 matches
- Wed Feb 10, 2010 10:43 am
- Forum: Configuring and compiling ABINIT
- Topic: [solved] problem with MPI
- Replies: 4
- Views: 9337
Re: problem with MPI
MPI being disabled has nothing to do with what you show. In order to help you, we'll need more information.
- Wed Feb 10, 2010 10:41 am
- Forum: Configuring and compiling ABINIT
- Topic: [SOLVED] MPI configuration in v.6.0.x
- Replies: 2
- Views: 8056
Re: MPI configuration in v.6.0.x
MPI support has been heavily refactored since 5.8. Most of the efforts have been on improving the consistency within the build system, and now MPI is handled as the other external packages. In order to be able to use --with-mpi-prefix, you should make sure that the CC, CXX, and FC environment variab...
- Thu Jan 28, 2010 5:39 pm
- Forum: Link to other codes
- Topic: revPBE Pseudos
- Replies: 6
- Views: 9249
- Wed Jan 27, 2010 5:28 pm
- Forum: Configuring and compiling ABINIT
- Topic: [SOLVED] prefix install location
- Replies: 4
- Views: 7237
Re: prefix install location
Fix committed.
- Wed Jan 27, 2010 5:01 pm
- Forum: Configuring and compiling ABINIT
- Topic: [SOLVED] prefix install location
- Replies: 4
- Views: 7237
Re: prefix install location
Dear Joe, The prefix "issue" is not a bug, it's a feature. I did this to become compliant with packaging standards. The version numbering problem you mention is known and will be fixed when you merge trunk into your branch. This was something I forgot to put in the new Abinit Forge managem...
- Wed Dec 09, 2009 10:47 pm
- Forum: Configuring and compiling ABINIT
- Topic: Introduction of debug levels
- Replies: 3
- Views: 6832
Re: Introduction of debug levels
Debugging symbols do not affect the performance of the code, nor its memory footprint, as they are not loaded in normal runs. They only impact the size of the binary. However, it is true that the more you optimize, the less using debugging symbols is relevant. In practice, it nevertheless provides i...
- Thu Dec 03, 2009 6:19 pm
- Forum: Configuring and compiling ABINIT
- Topic: Introduction of debug levels
- Replies: 3
- Views: 6832
Introduction of debug levels
Dear Developers, In order to facilitate the debugging of new developments, Matthieu and I are proposing to have different debug levels in the build system, controlled by --enable-debug: ⋅ no: debugging fully disabled; ⋅ yes: debug symbols are provided; ⋅ enhanced: more ...
- Tue Dec 01, 2009 7:42 pm
- Forum: Configuring and compiling ABINIT
- Topic: [SOLVED] Linalg detection
- Replies: 4
- Views: 6164
Re: Linalg detection
I've been having plans for an improved linalg support for a few years now, and have already made a few unsuccessful attempts. It slowly goes to higher and higher priority ranks on my todo list, but there are many other emergencies. Difficult to choose what to do first, sometimes ... If the weather i...
- Tue Dec 01, 2009 12:35 am
- Forum: Improving ABINIT
- Topic: Switching to RestructuredText for documentation
- Replies: 0
- Views: 3766
Switching to RestructuredText for documentation
Dear All, During the lifespan of Abinit 5, we've successfully used Markdown for a certain number of things. Markdown is indeed light, easy to learn, and easy to use. It was perfectly matching the requirements of our former website. However the situation has substantially changed now, and our needs h...
- Wed Oct 21, 2009 7:05 pm
- Forum: Improving ABINIT
- Topic: Input Variable (rename)
- Replies: 13
- Views: 11011
Re: Input Variable (rename)
Do you already have proposals about the nomenclature? If not, I recommend having a look at what they did for Octopus.
I can help in particular with the practical aspects of the migration to the new naming scheme once it is defined.
pouillon
I can help in particular with the practical aspects of the migration to the new naming scheme once it is defined.
pouillon