Search found 12 matches

by johnbrehm
Thu Oct 04, 2018 9:19 pm
Forum: Ground state
Topic: stress tensor output: 6 tensor components; not 9?
Replies: 1
Views: 1687

stress tensor output: 6 tensor components; not 9?

I get 6 tensor components (in each of .log and .out): 11, 22, 33, 32, 31, 21.
How do I get the other 3: 23 13 13?
by johnbrehm
Fri Sep 21, 2018 7:48 pm
Forum: Ground state
Topic: NEB: does it change the angdeg and acell after each loop?
Replies: 3
Views: 2771

Re: NEB: does it change the angdeg and acell after each loo

No, it is no rush.
whenever it comes around is fine.
Just good to know that I am note doing anything wrong.
Love abinit.
Look fwd to the next code iteration.
tnx,
jb
by johnbrehm
Thu Sep 13, 2018 4:57 pm
Forum: Ground state
Topic: stress tensor: stress.F90
Replies: 0
Views: 2356

stress tensor: stress.F90

I came across a post from 2009 concerning Hi, from the comments of the code in stress.F90, where the stress is calculated: !! NOTES !! * Concerning the stress tensor: !! See O. H. Nielsen and R. M. Martin, PRB 32, 3792 (1985). !! Note that first term in equation (2) should have minus sign !! (for ki...
by johnbrehm
Mon Sep 10, 2018 4:02 pm
Forum: Ground state
Topic: NEB: does it change the angdeg and acell after each loop?
Replies: 3
Views: 2771

NEB: does it change the angdeg and acell after each loop?

Hi, I just obtained by completed .out and .log file. I am scrolling through the files, and after each loop of each iteration I do not see any change to the angles or acell. Is this expected? I place no restraints on it this. here is the relevant input file lines: ntimimage 28 nimage 7 imgmov 5 #NEB ...
by johnbrehm
Sun Sep 09, 2018 10:18 pm
Forum: Ground state
Topic: NEB failure
Replies: 2
Views: 2364

Re: NEB failure

adding some more details to the problem: I grepped for mkmem in the log file on one of my attempts. I get a mkmem== 5. mpi_setup: mkmem undefined in the input file.Use default mkmem = nkpt mpi_setup: With nkpt_me=5 and mkmem = 68, ground state wf handled in core. Resetting mkmem to nkpt_me to save m...
by johnbrehm
Sun Sep 09, 2018 8:24 pm
Forum: Ground state
Topic: NEB failure
Replies: 2
Views: 2364

NEB failure

I am running an NEB. A. When I DO include a angdeg_lastimg and a acell_lastimg, the program just stops with no error following the start of the 2/7 image on the first iteration. Literally, there is no listing of an error in the log or out file. On some machines I do get a core dump. B. When I do NOT...
by johnbrehm
Thu Apr 26, 2018 5:25 pm
Forum: Response calculations
Topic: Wrong sign on piezeo d33 for barium titanate?
Replies: 7
Views: 6632

Re: Wrong sign on piezeo d33 for barium titanate?

Hi. 1. So I went back and re-did the relaxation and all subsequent steps using dilatmx = 1.05. (the coordinates and unti cell hardly changed from above) Now: angdeg 8.97097924575023E+01 8.97087625111718E+01 8.97087949482604E+01 acell 7.69474239743554E+00 7.69372635585211E+00 7.69375849953607E+00 xre...
by johnbrehm
Mon Apr 23, 2018 8:19 pm
Forum: Ground state
Topic: VDW: option 7 No 3rd body interaction???
Replies: 1
Views: 2541

VDW: option 7 No 3rd body interaction???

Hi, I am very confused by the Abinit literature. It says for vdw-xc: 7: apply vdw-DFT-D3(BJ) as proposed by Grimme (based on Becke-Jonhson method J. Chem. Phys. 2004-2006) Available only for ground-state calculations and response functions; see vdw_tol variable to control convergency I go to vdw_tol...
by johnbrehm
Mon Apr 23, 2018 6:42 pm
Forum: Response calculations
Topic: Wrong sign on piezeo d33 for barium titanate?
Replies: 7
Views: 6632

Re: Wrong sign on piezeo d33 for barium titanate?

Hi. 1. I take my relaxed structure and put it into the following script to get my WFK: iscf 17 ntime 500 nstep 500 ecutsm 0.5 tolvrs 1.0d-18 optforces 1 rfasr 1 ixc 11 ecut 25.0 diemac 9.0 diemix 0.6 dilatmx 1.2 strprecon 0.5 chkprim 0 kptopt 1 ngkpt 8 8 8 nshiftk 1 shiftk 0.5 0.5 0.5 I carry the WF...
by johnbrehm
Thu Apr 19, 2018 9:22 pm
Forum: Response calculations
Topic: Wrong sign on piezeo d33 for barium titanate?
Replies: 7
Views: 6632

Re: Wrong sign on piezeo d33 for barium titanate?

Thanks for your response. Generally, I relax to a very small force, in this case : max grad (force/stress) = 9.9119E-10 < tolmxf= 1.1000E-09 ha/bohr (free atoms) Now, I am doing the R3mR phase of BaTiO3. My relaxation yields the following which I carry all the way through to my phonon calc: angdeg 8...
by johnbrehm
Fri Apr 13, 2018 9:49 pm
Forum: Response calculations
Topic: Wrong sign on piezeo d33 for barium titanate?
Replies: 7
Views: 6632

Wrong sign on piezeo d33 for barium titanate?

I used DFPT to calculate the piezoresponse for barium titanate -- a simple 5 atom unit cell. Calculation ran quickly and without incident. BUT.... I get a negative value for d33 (-97). See the matrix below. The magnitude is correct. BUT the sign is wrong: BTO is not a negative piezo mat'l. Or is it ...
by johnbrehm
Mon Sep 25, 2017 9:37 pm
Forum: Response calculations
Topic: trying to run elfield; failing miserably.
Replies: 1
Views: 2625

trying to run elfield; failing miserably.

I tried the tutorial tffield_6.in and it worked fine. So, I branched out and changed to the real system I was working on: 40 atoms, monoclinic, with 156 val. bands. Miserable failure: it did the polarization calc fine, but then hung for hours after that. So, I decided to break up the ttfield_6.in. 1...