Search found 14 matches

by lucamontana
Wed Mar 01, 2017 4:57 pm
Forum: Many-body perturbation theory
Topic: e-e calculation using GW
Replies: 2
Views: 2838

Re: e-e calculation using GW

Dear Ajit,

The combination of GW and PAW in abinit is not fully working.

if you need PAW, you have to resort to GPAW or VASP.

Bests
LUCA
by lucamontana
Sat Feb 11, 2017 2:07 am
Forum: Many-body perturbation theory
Topic: In GW, why is VASP faster? How can Abinit beat VASP in GW?
Replies: 1
Views: 3092

Re: In GW, why is VASP faster? How can Abinit beat VASP in G

Dear Dominic, In order to gain speed when using abinit, you have to compile it with mpiifort compiler and mkl libraries. Furthermore, it could be possible that VASP has a better symmetry detection, and hence only for a smaller number of k points QP energies are calculated. If you are interested in f...
by lucamontana
Sat Dec 31, 2016 1:47 am
Forum: Ground state
Topic: input files for dft+u with paw for molecule
Replies: 1
Views: 1862

Re: input files for dft+u with paw for molecule

Dear mina, your input is correct, but i think that you have to further increase acell up to 60 angstrom in each direction in order to eliminate artificial screening from periodic images to a large extent, in particular as you have a relatively heavy element such as Co. I suggest you to resort to Qua...
by lucamontana
Mon Aug 29, 2016 11:17 pm
Forum: Many-body perturbation theory
Topic: GW band structure
Replies: 1
Views: 2783

Re: GW band structure

Never tried this with abinit but you can do it with yambo.
LUCA
by lucamontana
Mon Aug 29, 2016 11:15 pm
Forum: Many-body perturbation theory
Topic: YAMBO vs ABINIT?
Replies: 1
Views: 2674

Re: YAMBO vs ABINIT?

Please be a bit more specific, what are the differences ? In peak intensities or positions or both ?
Are the differences large or small ?
LUCA
by lucamontana
Mon Aug 29, 2016 11:14 pm
Forum: Many-body perturbation theory
Topic: Exciton binding energy
Replies: 3
Views: 3844

Re: Exciton binding energy

There are many examples in many papers regarding exciton binding energies. Just look at LiF, for instance. or BSE application on other simple systems.

LUCA
by lucamontana
Thu Aug 25, 2016 12:12 am
Forum: Many-body perturbation theory
Topic: Exciton binding energy
Replies: 3
Views: 3844

Re: Exciton binding energy

Exciton binding energy of the state #i = Band gap - Excitation energy of the state #i

LUCA
by lucamontana
Wed Jul 20, 2016 11:58 am
Forum: Link to other codes
Topic: pseudopotentials for graphene
Replies: 4
Views: 6051

Re: pseudopotentials for graphene

Just look at the pseudo potential parameters and you will know the differences in its construction.
LUCA
by lucamontana
Wed Jul 20, 2016 8:16 am
Forum: Many-body perturbation theory
Topic: Intraband Contribution to Screening File
Replies: 4
Views: 10263

Re: Intraband Contribution to Screening File

It is easy to verify whether the intraband contributions are contained in the screening or not by just comparing to the results obtained for a well known metal example. Just try "add_chi0_intraband=.TRUE." and look what happens. I never check it. Intraband contributions are always band str...
by lucamontana
Sun Jul 17, 2016 4:09 am
Forum: Many-body perturbation theory
Topic: what are the correct GW energies [SOLVED]
Replies: 1
Views: 4018

Re: what are the correct GW energies [SOLVED]

E(N)_pert is the pertubatively calculated quasi particle energies at the N-th iteration step and the column E(N)_diago is the exact quasi particle energy (at the N-th iteration step) by performing an exact diagonalization of the subspace of quasi particle Hamiltonian. Example : Band E_lda <Vxclda> E...
by lucamontana
Sun Jul 17, 2016 3:46 am
Forum: Many-body perturbation theory
Topic: Intraband Contribution to Screening File
Replies: 4
Views: 10263

Re: Intraband Contribution to Screening File

Intraband contributions are important in case of metals for which you need a very very dense k-grid (18x18X18) to obtain converged results.
For semi conductors and insulators intraband transitions are absent.

LUCA
by lucamontana
Wed Mar 16, 2016 5:39 am
Forum: Many-body perturbation theory
Topic: GW corrections for anti-ferromagnetic materials
Replies: 1
Views: 3067

GW corrections for anti-ferromagnetic materials

Dear all,

I am trying to calculate GW corrections for an anti-ferromagnetic material, but obtain :

Code: Select all

--- !ERROR
message: |
    Shubnikov type III not implemented
src_file: m_chi0.F90
src_line: 1245
...


Is there any way to circumvent Shubnikov ?

Bests
L.
by lucamontana
Wed Mar 16, 2016 5:36 am
Forum: Many-body perturbation theory
Topic: non local part of the pseudo potential ..
Replies: 2
Views: 3557

Re: non local part of the pseudo potential ..

Dear Matteo,

many thanks.
Will abinit8 be realeased soon ?

Bests
L.
by lucamontana
Tue Mar 15, 2016 3:12 am
Forum: Many-body perturbation theory
Topic: non local part of the pseudo potential ..
Replies: 2
Views: 3557

non local part of the pseudo potential ..

Dear all,
Is there any way of disabling non-local part of the pseudo potential in the calculation of screening ?
I would like to jump this term : limit q->0, including term <n,k|[Vnl,iqr]|n"k> .

Bests
LUCA